“You’re too
close,” Mercer said. “You have to be a long way off, the way the androids are.
They have better perspective.” [p.214]
This
passage reminds me of No Woman Born by
Moore when Harris contemplates about who has the better view of Deirdre, himself
who is too far, or Maltzer who is too close. In No Woman Born, Maltzer is unable to perceive Deirdre as anything
other than a collection of metal. I thought that was not unlike how the
androids can only perceive the outer appearance, the superficial level of
Mercerism. What the androids do not get is the social power that Mercerism has
through empathetic connections and it does not matter whether or not it is
real. It is like how Maltzer could not conceptualize the fact that Deirdre can
be perceived as something else by others because all he has seen is her in her
metallic glory.
Or
maybe the passage has more to do with one’s willingness to find such things.
Being “close” representing emotional attachment, one could not find faults with
the system of Mercerism because they refuse to acknowledge them unless they are
spelled out. Humans cannot find such things as faults because they are
experiencing what Mercer is first hand; they are too busy to climb up the hill
and get hit by stone to look around the surrounding and notice something wrong
with it. But as Androids are detached to the situation, being unable to connect
through the empathy box, they can ascertain the situation at hand more
accurately, because they are objective.
No comments:
Post a Comment